Two Supes Think County Should Own Tijuana River Pollution Crisis

Media
56 minutes ago
5 min read

The Tijuana River, which typically only flows in the rainy winter season, begins to flow over the U.S.-Mexico border after a couple of wastewater leaks or breaks in Tijuana. / U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission | Click on image to enlarge

San Diego County Supervisors Paloma Aguirre and Terra Lawson-Remer want the county to pay for treating the entire Tijuana River because, they say, that’s their job.

Around 1 a.m. this morning, about 13 million gallons of water, sewage and who knows what else flowed down the Tijuana River, across the border and into the United States.

At around 5 a.m., the level of sewer gas (called hydrogen sulfide) wafting off the river measured twice what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers safe to breathe.

Kicker is, the river shouldn’t be flowing at all right now. It’s a seasonal river, which means it should be dry in the summertime, because it’s not raining (and hasn’t since May.)

Mexico sends part of its sewage through a pipe across the border to a treatment plant on the U.S. side run by the federal government. But nobody’s treating the Tijuana River itself, which is often contaminated by runaway sewage, once it flows into San Diego, through an estuary and finally into the Pacific Ocean south of Imperial Beach.

San Diego County Supervisors Paloma Aguirre and Terra-Lawson Remer think the county, and the county taxpayer, should.

“We’re done waiting for someone else’s timeline.”—Supervisor Paloma Aguirre at Monday press conference

In November, voters will decide whether to raise the county’s sales tax by half a cent. If they do, about $80 million of the money raised each year would be put toward solving the Tijuana River pollution problem. The measure doesn’t specifically say how the money would be spent, but Aguirre – whose political career has been fueled by solving the crisis – put out a plan to capture and treat the entire Tijuana River.

The two supervisors hope their colleagues at Tuesday’s board meeting will agree to infuse $1.8 million in county reserves toward that plan. The amount, they said, would pay to start mapping out how the county might do that.

Treating an entire river is no easy feat. In fact, this attempt on the Tijuana River could be the first of its kind.

Featured press conference speaker Natalie Mladenov, a professor of civil, construction and environmental engineering at San Diego State University, couldn’t name another project like it off the top of her head.

“In this country, rivers don’t have sewage in them, but we treat large volumes that come through pipes. We have the engineering capability to divert water… to a treatment system.” —Natalie Mladenov, Professor of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at San Diego State University

Here, we’re talking about a river – not sewage moved through a pipe.

The Tijuana River has long been plagued with stuff other than sewage. Water tests showed byproducts from banned soaps and cleaners, metals used in industrial plating, parasitic worms, and chemicals from plastics. The water would have to be treated well enough that it could either be reused, put back into the river channel or sent to the Pacific Ocean – where sewage treated at the border plant goes now.

There’s also a ton of sand the flowing river brings along with it, and trash, which can clog-up and sometimes break treatment facilities.

Then there’s the problem of where the county would build a treatment plant.

The Tijuana River estuary is divvied up among a patchwork of land owners from the International Boundary and Water Commission (the federal agency that manages the border plant) to the city of San Diego to California State Parks, Homeland Security, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the Navy and private owners.

The EPA paid consultant PG Environmental to study river diversion back in 2021. The consultant looked at what it would take to build a system that intercepted the river water, and routed it to a new, advanced treatment plant at the existing border water plant owned by the federal government and operated by Veolia, a private contractor.

There’s lots of red tape. Altering the river would have to be OK’d by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California’s Department of Fish and Wildlife. The project would have to meet zoning requirements by the city of San Diego. And, due to its proximity to the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection would need to approve the plans, too.

It’s a costly endeavor. Building and maintaining the project over the infrastructure’s 40 year lifespan would cost an estimated $28 million and $63 million, depending on its size, PG Environmental wrote. An advanced treatment plant would cost another $280 million to $640 million to build and maintain.

That’s partly why the EPA ranked diverting the river through a treatment plant as the last thing to try and do on the U.S. side of the border in terms of solving the crisis.

But the supervisors believe this sales tax is their golden ticket around that. If voters approved the measure in November, the supervisors said the revenue for the river could be packaged into bond financing and provide billions to invest immediately. (Essentially, that path would allow the county to borrow far more money than the tax brings in each year, through the issuance of bonds. The tax money would be used as a guarantee to pay back the bond financing.)

Aguirre and Lawson-Remer said the county would play a role in owning whatever would be built at the border.

“It would definitely have to be a significant true partnership with other agencies… we’d have to partner with IBWC who has federal jurisdiction in that particular area we’re talking about.” —Supervisor Paloma Aguirre

She also mentioned the city of San Diego might play a role if the county were to incorporate the city’s South Bay Water Reclamation Plant as part of the solution. The parties could become a joint powers authority, which is a separate government entity created when two or more public agencies decide to share resources, services and power.

I asked, if this all were to happen, whether the county would then be legally responsible for the treatment of the river water. This seems like a huge legal liability given all of the surprises the Tijuana River could throw at those who try to wrangle it. The International Boundary and Water Commission is sued regularly for failing to clean the sewage it receives to Clean Water Act standards.

“The county currently already has a significant amount of legal responsibility and liability for clean water. That’s our job. I think we should be responsible. You don’t want supervisors who don’t want to do their job because they’re scared of being held accountable.”—Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer